When a creationist says "...then why are there still monkeys?", I wonder what they think of people being born with tails? I mean, that's like the ultimate monkey trait. If this wasn't a thing that actually happened, and some people were born instead with, say, a monkey-like chin or teeth, they would say "Yeah, but it's not like they were born with tails, uh-hyuck!" But here we are with people being born with tails. How do they sweep that under the rug?
"Oh, well, that's just tail-like. It's not a real tail. We aren't animals!"
And surprisingly, we aren't born with antler-like structures on our heads (strange warts exculded).
"Oh, well, that's just tail-like. It's not a real tail. We aren't animals!"
And surprisingly, we aren't born with antler-like structures on our heads (strange warts exculded).
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
