(March 28, 2016 at 12:57 am)IATIA Wrote:(March 28, 2016 at 12:29 am)Alex K Wrote: You'll have to be more specific than that it runs "on an interrupt system". How does the system notice that the AI intends to hurt humans?
Microprocessors have an interrupt input that will force it to jump to a subroutine. This subroutine would check for interaction with a human. It would be as simple as having a clock circuit that would send an interrupt every 100ms or whatever is deemed appropriate. I take it that you are not involved with microprocessors at the machine level.
I've written Assembly. Have you ever trained an AI? My point was that controlling the "thoughts" of a complex AI is super complicated.
What you want to do is basically put a completely independent pattern recognition on top of the AI that stops the machine in crucial situations. That might work for scenarios with few degrees of freedom, but if I project a couple of decades into the future, with AI freely interacting with the world e.g. as mobile robots, you will have to know the intentions of the AI, a blunt pattern recognition as in "don't stab the human shaped thing" won't do.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
