RE: New Rule: Posting Private Correspondence
March 31, 2016 at 5:39 pm
(This post was last modified: March 31, 2016 at 6:15 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 31, 2016 at 4:43 pm)robvalue Wrote: Sure, probably not. I was just explaining how Huggy's signature wasn't randomly taken away as a staff conspiracy as he'd love to think.
Except your explanation is simply not true. I've provided the evidence that FaF was not misrepresented or taken out of context, I asked him a question and he answered the question, that IS the full context. Backtracking after the fact does not change the original context.
How is this not clear?
Posting the answer alone would take the answer out of context, But including the question with the answer puts the answer in proper context, got it?