RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 2, 2016 at 1:57 am
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2016 at 1:58 am by Mystic.)
(April 2, 2016 at 1:53 am)smfortune Wrote:(April 2, 2016 at 1:45 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I think this proof might work, don't get me wrong. I just want to understand it. It seems you are making a tautology by 3 double implications, that once you rework, will lead to the conclusion. I just don't know how you concluded on those double implications.
That's right. I use the equivalence rule to break down the double implications into their single implication form.
Ok so write down the "if and only if" statement which would be the double implication. Or right the two separate implications. I'm not contesting the theory, I believe in God and believe there are various sound arguments point to her existence, I just want to see how this argument is both valid (valid seems alright) and sound. Sound is my main contention, I don't know why these double implications are evident, unless you can explain exactly what they are saying (if and only if type statement in English or show the two separate implied statements).