Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2025, 8:11 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
Thomas Aquinas

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Thomas Aquinas
tackattack Offline
Non-Militant Hippie Lover
*****
Religious Views: Non-denominational Christian
Posts: 4446
Threads: 87
Joined: December 2, 2009
Reputation: 47
#2
RE: Thomas Aquinas
March 18, 2011 at 8:38 am
I'm sure his audience was Christian. One thing he did teach was unity within the body of Christ, so it doesn't actually include non-believers. Ergo, it has less to do with the entire world and more about Christiandom.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
Thomas Aquinas

Messages In This Thread
Thomas Aquinas - by ib.me.ub - March 18, 2011 at 7:48 am
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by tackattack - March 18, 2011 at 8:38 am
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by ib.me.ub - March 18, 2011 at 10:29 am
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by corndog36 - March 18, 2011 at 10:32 am
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by ib.me.ub - March 18, 2011 at 10:38 am
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by Minimalist - March 18, 2011 at 12:16 pm
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by Anomalocaris - March 18, 2011 at 1:35 pm
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by padraic - March 18, 2011 at 6:12 pm
RE: Thomas Aquinas - by ib.me.ub - March 19, 2011 at 12:01 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)