Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 16, 2025, 5:29 am
Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Maybe Kolob?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Maybe Kolob?
BrianSoddingBoru4 Offline
Power-Drunk Administrator
********
Religious Views: Headology
Posts: 48833
Threads: 552
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 109
#9
RE: Maybe Kolob?
April 3, 2016 at 5:52 pm
Going to go all pedantic for a bit:

1. They didn't 'spot a baby Earth'. They found a debris ring which suggests the early stages of accretion.

2. Whatever was found, it wasn't 'orbiting a young sun'. There is exactly one 'Sun' in the entire universe, and it is one helluva lot close to us than 176 light years.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled Horribly Inaccurate Media Reportage Regarding Science.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Maybe Kolob?

Messages In This Thread
Maybe Kolob? - by Minimalist - April 3, 2016 at 3:32 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by FebruaryOfReason - April 3, 2016 at 3:34 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by Alex K - April 3, 2016 at 3:38 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by brewer - April 3, 2016 at 3:38 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by FebruaryOfReason - April 3, 2016 at 4:24 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by Alex K - April 3, 2016 at 4:29 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by Minimalist - April 3, 2016 at 5:01 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by Alex K - April 3, 2016 at 5:42 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - April 3, 2016 at 5:52 pm
RE: Maybe Kolob? - by vorlon13 - April 3, 2016 at 6:00 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)