Dr. Craig is a liar.

[Alex K]

If the atheists would stop breeding new people to dream up theories about God, we would be able to do the same.

Huh???

Don't know anything about the site, but this was an interesting section from http://www.iep.utm.edu/religion/

Given the advances of science and the retreat of religious beliefs, many in the latter half of the twentieth century agreed with the general Freudian view that a new era was on the horizon in which the infantile illusions, or perhaps delusions, of religion would soon go the way of the ancient Greek and Roman gods. With the onset of the twenty-first century, however, a new narrative has emerged. Religion has not fallen into oblivion, as many anticipated; in fact, religious belief is on the rise. Many factors account for this, including challenges to psychological and sociological theories which hold belief in God to be pathological or neurotic.

You think religious belief is on the rise? Because some psychological theories are being criticised? That sounds really made up.

In recent decades these theories have themselves been challenged by medical and psychological research, being understood by many to be theories designed primarily to destroy belief in God. Another important factor is the increase in the number of believing and outspoken scientists, such as Francis Collins, the director of the human genome project.

Ok, you have one prominent candidate who is famous for his work in the 20th century. Quite the systematic increase!

At the other end of the spectrum regarding religion, however, is a fairly small but vocal band of intellectual atheists who have spawned a movement dubbed the “New Atheism.” These atheists, whose leading voices include Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennett, attempt to demonstrate that respect for belief in God is irrational and socially unacceptable.

Erm, no they don't? Irrational, sure, but trying to demonstrate that it is socially unacceptable, where did you get that from?

But despite this orchestrated opposition arguing the falsity and incoherence of theism, it has proved rather resilient. Indeed, the twenty-first century is reflecting a renewed interest in philosophical theism.

It is as resilient to logic as its believers