(April 6, 2016 at 11:35 pm)The_Empress Wrote:(April 6, 2016 at 11:20 pm)AAA Wrote: Don't lecture me about what is and what isn't science. I wrote it like that because I didn't want to cycle back in to whether or not the reasons I gave were scientific. If you are going to restrict us to the empirical definition of science, then nothing about the past is scientific, end of story.
You need the lecture because you obviously don't have a clue what science actually is.
Just because you assert "end of story" does not make it so.
I don't need the lecture, I get plenty of them. I am a biology student with a chemistry minor. What is science to you? Is it observable/demonstrable/competing hypothesis/quantitative/repeatable?