RE: True randomness in QM
April 7, 2016 at 10:14 pm
(This post was last modified: April 7, 2016 at 10:16 pm by ignoramus.)
I believe there is no such thing as randomness.
If we are to analyse things to the nth degree, we would be able to accurately predict the behaviour of all things.
I don't believe nature has a built in RNG.
How granular do we want or can go?
Predict genetic mutations, angle and direction of blades of grass growing in a field?
On a smaller scale, smacking a rack of billiard balls? It's the butterfly effect everywhere.
One bees dick off and the ball at the end of the chain of collisions will just miss going into the hole by another bees dick!
Can someone tell me if we can predict the outcome of a complex RNG?
Surely we can? We programmed the bastard?
Disclaimer: no bees genitals were harmed in the making of this post!
If we are to analyse things to the nth degree, we would be able to accurately predict the behaviour of all things.
I don't believe nature has a built in RNG.
How granular do we want or can go?
Predict genetic mutations, angle and direction of blades of grass growing in a field?
On a smaller scale, smacking a rack of billiard balls? It's the butterfly effect everywhere.
One bees dick off and the ball at the end of the chain of collisions will just miss going into the hole by another bees dick!
Can someone tell me if we can predict the outcome of a complex RNG?
Surely we can? We programmed the bastard?
Disclaimer: no bees genitals were harmed in the making of this post!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Know God, Know fear.
