RE: True randomness in QM
April 7, 2016 at 10:41 pm
(This post was last modified: April 7, 2016 at 10:41 pm by TheRealJoeFish.)
(April 7, 2016 at 10:14 pm)ignoramus Wrote: If we are to analyse things to the nth degree, we would be able to accurately predict the behaviour of all things.
That's part of the issue, though: that statement makes perfect sense, and seems like it should be true, and has to be true, and in our every-day lives at the scales we work with it is true. But, universally, it *may not be true*. It's quite possible that an impossibility to predict, even with perfect knowledge, is a built in bugfeature in the universe
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.