Um, guys.... I think Atlas is leading us up the garden path here. See the post-modernist essay generator: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/
For example:
For example:
Quote:The subconstructivist paradigm of discourse and social realism
Charles J. McElwaine
Department of Sociology, University of Illinois
Wilhelm Tilton
Department of English, Oxford University
1. Fellini and capitalist deconstruction
“Society is intrinsically unattainable,” says Lyotard; however, according to
Porter[1] , it is not so much society that is intrinsically
unattainable, but rather the economy of society. Thus, if the subconstructivist
paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between prematerialist
capitalism and dialectic subcultural theory. Social realism implies that
academe is capable of intent.
In a sense, Baudrillard promotes the use of prematerialist capitalism to
challenge hierarchy. In Gravity’s Rainbow, Pynchon denies social
realism; in V, although, he examines the subconstructivist paradigm of
discourse.
But Sontag uses the term ‘Lyotardist narrative’ to denote the common ground
between class and sexual identity. Buxton[2] holds that we
have to choose between prematerialist capitalism and capitalist narrative.
Therefore, the primary theme of Dietrich’s[3] analysis of
modernist theory is the rubicon, and eventually the paradigm, of predialectic
society. Debord suggests the use of prematerialist capitalism to modify
reality.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.