Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 31, 2025, 12:39 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A heshe philosophy.
#18
RE: A heshe philosophy.
Um, guys.... I think Atlas is leading us up the garden path here. See the post-modernist essay generator: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

For example:
Quote:The subconstructivist paradigm of discourse and social realism

Charles J. McElwaine

Department of Sociology, University of Illinois

Wilhelm Tilton

Department of English, Oxford University
1. Fellini and capitalist deconstruction

“Society is intrinsically unattainable,” says Lyotard; however, according to
Porter[1] , it is not so much society that is intrinsically
unattainable, but rather the economy of society. Thus, if the subconstructivist
paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between prematerialist
capitalism and dialectic subcultural theory. Social realism implies that
academe is capable of intent.

In a sense, Baudrillard promotes the use of prematerialist capitalism to
challenge hierarchy. In Gravity’s Rainbow, Pynchon denies social
realism; in V, although, he examines the subconstructivist paradigm of
discourse.

But Sontag uses the term ‘Lyotardist narrative’ to denote the common ground
between class and sexual identity. Buxton[2] holds that we
have to choose between prematerialist capitalism and capitalist narrative.

Therefore, the primary theme of Dietrich’s[3] analysis of
modernist theory is the rubicon, and eventually the paradigm, of predialectic
society. Debord suggests the use of prematerialist capitalism to modify
reality.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
A heshe philosophy. - by WinterHold - April 9, 2016 at 7:31 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by TheRealJoeFish - April 9, 2016 at 7:54 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by Goosebump - April 9, 2016 at 7:55 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - April 9, 2016 at 8:46 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by Goosebump - April 9, 2016 at 8:51 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - April 9, 2016 at 8:56 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by WinterHold - April 9, 2016 at 9:30 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by ApeNotKillApe - April 9, 2016 at 8:47 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by Cato - April 9, 2016 at 8:53 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by Goosebump - April 9, 2016 at 8:55 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by Goosebump - April 9, 2016 at 8:58 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - April 9, 2016 at 10:17 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by WinterHold - April 10, 2016 at 12:09 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - April 10, 2016 at 5:41 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by Silver - April 10, 2016 at 12:14 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by J a c k - April 10, 2016 at 12:17 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by WinterHold - April 10, 2016 at 12:43 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by FebruaryOfReason - April 10, 2016 at 5:47 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by Little lunch - April 10, 2016 at 6:33 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by WinterHold - April 10, 2016 at 11:50 am
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by J a c k - April 10, 2016 at 1:51 pm
RE: A heshe philosophy. - by WinterHold - April 10, 2016 at 4:17 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)