(April 11, 2016 at 8:17 pm)Goosebump Wrote:(April 11, 2016 at 8:07 pm)Jenny A Wrote: I wouldn't require anyone to use such a bathroom, but men with infant daughters, mixed sex couples who need to assist one another, people looking after severely retarded members of the opposite sex, and persons in transition of ambiguous visual gender would appreciate a neutral room.,
What part of appreciate versus required to use did you miss?
I didn't see "appreciate" in the quote or what you were responding to when I quoted it. If I missed an earlier post that's my bad and I apologize.
The reason why I enter into the "required" argument is that is the vain of the thread with Catholic_lady. It's where my mind was and that influenced how I read it.
Just to be clear: you don't think a transgender should have to use the unisex BR, in your summation they could use that one or the one they gender identify with?
- Again sorry for the confusion. -
No I think people's bathroom of choice is fine. But a third option would be nice in larger venues just as a one room unisex room works in smaller venues.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.