(April 12, 2016 at 12:12 pm)Drich Wrote:(April 12, 2016 at 10:31 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Focusing on the semantics of what is or isn't a mental illness is the wrong argument here, IMO.
That's because for you it is a no win situation, but is the whole point of this thread. If GID fits a medical diagnosis of mental illness then why are the mentally Ill allowed to change the laws?
And all this time I thought it was the elected representatives changing the laws.
How many of them have a diagnosed mental illness I wonder? Depression? Anxiety? Other things not immediately visible? What are you doing to keep them from changing the law?