(April 15, 2016 at 8:30 pm)paulpablo Wrote:(April 15, 2016 at 8:18 pm)Losty Wrote: I don't know either. For the most part I really like just letting the businesses be bigoted douchebags and lose all their clients due to boycotting. But that leaves some people very vulnerable. I can't imagine being trans in a part of the country where everyone is a bigoted douchebag especially if you can't afford to move away. Should these people have a lower quality of life just because we don't like to force businesses to do things? Should we make that kind of sacrifice choosing a business' freedom over a person's dignity? I don't know. I don't think so.
But there's plenty of discriminated people out there who the government doesn't help with force. I mean I can't imagine how bad it must be to be really ugly with a tiny penis. They have no access to vagina from a good looking woman, and yet their bodies testosterone constantly demands that they get vagina from a good looking woman. He will have no chance of getting certain jobs in a trendy clothing store or part of a sales team. They could possibly pay for access to sex but that would be illegal. So they're being discriminated against and the one thing they could do to stop it is actually prevented by several government laws.
What the fuck does this have to do with the discussion? You're still stuck thinking of businesses and people and they're not.
