(April 15, 2016 at 8:46 pm)paulpablo Wrote:(April 15, 2016 at 8:41 pm)Losty Wrote: Exactly, businesses. No people will be required to open their homes to strangers for using the restroom or any other reason.
Your analogy makes no sense. A woman is not a business. And businesses do not refuse services to people based on penis size or ugliness. These aren't real groups that are being discriminated against by businesses. The government forcing women to have sex with ugly small dick men vs forcing businesses to provide the services they already provide without discriminating is apples to dinosaurs
but when we use the word business we're talking about people and the discriminatory decisions they make.
If we say "the bakery down the road discriminates against homosexuals" we're talking about the people who own the business, not the bricks and mortar that make the walls of the bakery or the bread or the ovens, it's people. People discriminate based on looks, intelligence, charm, who's closer to them in family. So in both senses it's just people discriminating against other people, denying them what they want based on things they can't control.
No we aren't talking about him we are talking about his business. Not the building. The business. If he doesn't want to bake cakes he is welcome to pack his shit up and go home. No one requires him personally to be a baker or to bake cakes. But if he has a cake baking business then his business is required to offer services without descriminating.