(April 18, 2016 at 12:50 pm)paulpablo Wrote:(April 18, 2016 at 12:47 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Things a "security guard doing patrols to do toilet checks" are actually doing:
* Making sure no one is hurt, injured, or passed out from intoxicants or medical conditions.
* Examining every part of their patrol route for problems of any kind, with which they might assist.
* Making their presence felt/seen so everyone feels safer in every part of their patrol area.
Things a security guard is NOT doing, during the patrol mentioned above:
* Making sure the female in the ladies room doesn't have a penis hidden under her/his dress.
Right, but where did I say they would be doing that? I said they are guarded. I didn't say they are checking the genitals of each person walking in.
Okay, fine. But the argument here has been that bathrooms are a place anyone can just walk into, within seconds. In order for that NOT to be true, there would have to be specific guards standing at the entrances, who are stopping people from doing so.
There may be a few locations where that holds true, but for 99% of restrooms (and certainly all the ones I've ever seen), I could just walk right into a ladies' room at any time.
In other words, the "security guards" argument is a red herring, and I attempted to show you why that was so.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.