RE: Transexuals
April 18, 2016 at 9:40 pm
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2016 at 9:42 pm by Sterben.)
(April 17, 2016 at 5:55 am)Mathilda Wrote:(April 15, 2016 at 8:58 pm)Sterben Wrote: I do understand how SRS works,
...
To all who disagree with me, I consider SRS to be cosmetic.
Then you clearly do not understand the consequences of not being able to have SRS.
You can have SRS, I disagree with employers having to pay for it. These surgeries should be self-funded, it's their problem that they feel like a different gender. I can understand the fear and the self-hatred that can come with Gender Identity issues. You can always finance SRS operations, I would just hate the fact of having to pay more for the sake of others in this regards. Now, since I'm not a complete ass-hole I have a idea for employers to be able to cover a operation.
Company A offers various types of coverage's, the only way for a employee to able to get a SRS surgery is to have the highest level of coverage. It works to be perfectly fair so other employees aren't getting screwed on the cost of there coverage's. It may be considered unfair to make them pay for the highest grade of coverage to get the operation. At the end of the day serious and costly cosmetic surgeries should not have to be floated by others to pay for it.