(April 19, 2016 at 9:00 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(April 19, 2016 at 8:56 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I agree with that. If I am God's representative, then I am a sorry choice, which definitely proves I am not. But even if people all thought I was high and pure, without proof from God, I would be a wrong choice to assume by people. Who and what qualities do you expect in who represents God and his teachings?
I would expect a representative that can provide demonstrable, falsifiable evidence and reasoned argument for the existence of their god.
Better yet, if a god actually did exist, he would know exactly what I need in order to believe he exists, and be able to provide it unambiguously. He wouldn't need a representative.
What other qualities would you expect. I agree on what you said so far. A representative of God must able to do that but what other qualities would you assume he must have?
