(April 3, 2011 at 12:31 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: For something that supports "creation science", they sure do spend the vast majority of their time trying to disprove evolution. If they had a working theory, then why are they not focusing on that instead of attacking another? Its akin to biology attacking astronomy instead of presenting arguments for biology...it makes no sense. Its like the majority of their argument is "evolutionists say this..by they are wrong, and this is why they are wrong". The most they could ever hope for is proving evolution wrong, not proving creationism, if they keep following this system of thought.
They are only proving that they are biologically illiterate, and nothing more.
Creationists get away with a lot of stuff from just implying that God may have a chance(of course forgetting that God is not the only solution) . We learn how to understand many things from implication(if the logic is correct then the implication is logically correct) which is the vehicle they are using to sell their psycho shit on except the kind of vehicle they are using is defective. The fallacious logic is usually assumed by the non-skeptical ones, so they don't touch that area if they can get away with it.
