I think we are miss-using "scientific fact" here. The surgeon guy on this forum could explain way better than I can. A guess, that can be interpreted as "true" because of modern science isn't proof they got a scientific conclusion way back when. Of course they didn't they didn't have science back then.
I think Aoi Magi said it best a couple of posts ago:
Bottom line there is ZERO science in scripture, just what apologists bend into "precognition" nonsense.
I think Aoi Magi said it best a couple of posts ago:
Quote:All religious scripts claim to have scientific facts which are later discovered, but the this is if there truly were scientific facts we wouldn't have had the need to rediscover them in the first place.
Bottom line there is ZERO science in scripture, just what apologists bend into "precognition" nonsense.
"I'm thick." - Me
