Transexuals

[Brian37]

Seems to me that any objections to transsexuals using the bathrooms they identify with would be supported by actual data highlighting what a menace to public safety such a practice has resulted in.  The dearth of such data speaks volumes.

Drippy and people of his ilk love to harp on "Why should we support/allow such a low percentage of the population to have special treatment?" not realizing that such a mindset is anathema to our society on the whole.  Might as well complain about wheelchair ramps, or brail.  And, of course, transsexuals aren't asking for special treatment, but to be allowed to continue receiving equal treatment.

Legislation is written to solve a perceived problem, but there's no actual problem here outside of fear.  Why?  Because if transsexuals in bathrooms was a legitimate problem we would be acutely aware of it by now.  No, this is just religious idiots fearing what they think is icky and trying to make everyone else comply with their discomfort.  Fuck that and fuck them.

Where is anything that i have said can you extrapolate this? I said keep mentally ill men and men who want to exploit a loop hole in the law out of the womens bathroom.

I only pointed to the 1%ers to identify that the majority of the 1% go completely untreated meaning they are mentally ill by the very definition of the word and we are allowing to circumvent due process of how laws are generally made so that they may force legitimacy and acceptance of their unregulated mental illness, and you morons line up like lemmings, no matter who may be endangered. Which brings us to the real concern. Sexual preaditors who would have no issue putting on a dress and wait in ambush to attack unsuspecting women.

We already have couple a dozen examples of sex predators putting on dresses to take advantage of this law.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sexual...to-assault

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...-children/


http://komonews.com/archive/police-man-i...s-bathroom

Now before you go running off chasing your tail let review what my points actually are:
1) At best 1% of the population will benfit from this law as it is intended.
2) of those 1%ers the majority go untreated for mental illness.
3) This laws put 1/2 if not more of the population in a state of undress potentially with a mentally ill man, or a sexual predator wearing a dress.
4)mentally ill people should not be making policy that endangers the population just because they want to legitmise their delusions.

You're quoting Breitfuck, a right wing rag...... Yea, that's neutral and objective.