Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 14, 2025, 9:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tractor beams, IRL
#3
RE: Tractor beams, IRL
(April 6, 2011 at 1:56 pm)Chuck Wrote: Maybe it can work with macroscopic objects via exceptionally powerful source of low frequency radio waves

The power required really would be exceptional!

Take a metre cube object, weighing 1kg, and assume 1% scattering (this is quite optimistic). To give it a macroscopic acceleration, say 0.1 m/s^2, you'd need an RF generator putting out about 10^9 Watts!
For comparison, communication radio stations put out about 10^4 Watts.

And that's not even mentioning the difficulties associated with getting the necessary beam profile; getting a decent short wavelength pseudo-Bessel beam (for optical tweezers and the like) is difficult enough, I wouldn't want to think about doing it with radio waves!

But by the time we can build the Death Star, I'm sure this won't be a problem Big Grin
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Tractor beams, IRL - by lilphil1989 - March 10, 2011 at 5:44 pm
RE: Tractor beams, IRL - by Anomalocaris - April 6, 2011 at 1:56 pm
RE: Tractor beams, IRL - by lilphil1989 - April 8, 2011 at 10:12 am
RE: Tractor beams, IRL - by Anomalocaris - April 8, 2011 at 2:39 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)