(May 4, 2016 at 9:03 pm)SteveII Wrote:(May 4, 2016 at 7:25 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: True that, the scientific method has no way to inspect what is not real. Next piece of nonsense, please.
"what is not real" huh. What do you mean by real?
What can be demonstrated by objective means to be so. Take for example yhwh, we know him to be imaginaty because of the impossuble attributes ascribred to him in the bible, so he's a good example. The current thinking on him (I use the word thinking very loosely) is that he is a being which is indectectable by any measuring instrument, completely divorced from our reality and able to change our reality on a whim without us being possibly ever able to detect his influence. Now this being who theists insists we'll never detect (until we die and go to heaven) can safely be dismissed because as theists point out we'll never have evidence (not one single scrap) for him.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home