I think his books on evolutionary theory are top-notch examples of popular science writing that should be more widely known.
His cheerleading for atheism? Meh. I don't need him to explain to myself the idea that believers have failed to provide good reasons for me to believe in their invisible friends. Who needs atheist "leaders" when there are so many faith "leaders" who fail to persuade at every turn?
His cheerleading for atheism? Meh. I don't need him to explain to myself the idea that believers have failed to provide good reasons for me to believe in their invisible friends. Who needs atheist "leaders" when there are so many faith "leaders" who fail to persuade at every turn?