RE: Classical Liberalism
April 8, 2011 at 8:23 pm
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2011 at 8:27 pm by theVOID.)
(April 8, 2011 at 6:48 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Classical liberalism = SLAVERS. Someone who is willing to steal people and sell them to other people. Some Classical Liberals would be more than happy to inpregnate a slave and sell their own children into slavery just so that he (Classical liberals are usually males) can make an easy profit.
Resorting to straw men already? I have NO RIGHT to force anybody to do what they don't want to, that absolutely includes taking people by force and selling them! Classical liberals like Adam Smith were the FIRST people against slavery, racism, sexism and the like in modern society. Classical Liberalism has always been against those things because it is an absolute violation of the rights of the individual.
(April 8, 2011 at 7:29 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Voids intent declares him guilty. Look at how he mocked me of the price of matches. What is his intent? Apparently he has no problem becoming the lord of matches. If so, then so be it.. but dont try to fool me with that "libertarian" crap at the same time. If even ONE person can lord it over on anything, then libertarianism has been destroyed.
You can start your own match company if you don't like my prices, ANYONE can. But as long as nobody is willing to make or import matches to compete don't think you have the right to tell me what to sell my stuff for. If I use force or threats of violence to stop someone setting up competition then fucking lock me up!
That doesn't make me the "Lord of matches" it makes me a person who is allowed to charge whatever the fuck I like for MY stuff.
Quote:So which one is it Void? Libertarian or Plutocrat?
You need to cut the strawman bullshit, I'm a strict individualist.
Quote:It sure looks like you are against keynesian economics, unless it means you will benefit from it.
What the fuck??? Where, at what point, ANYWHERE, did I advocate Keynesianism?
.
