Not endorsing Trump, but I'm noting in regards to the seemingly largest outrage he's accrued so far, that if the current (and past) administrations have so poorly managed the agencies in charge of vetting the people crossing the border into the US and he wants a hiatus till that problem can be addressed, then who is really deserving of criticism ?
Trump for wanting to fix something or the folks that either broke, didn't upgrade, or mismanaged that system ??
Operating a system so poorly that it needs to be shut down, fixed and rebooted (shades of the looming DC Metro fiasco!) isn't the fault of the one noting it's broken and wants to fix it, it's the folks that set it up/ broke it/ didn't maintain it/ didn't upgrade it that need a kick in the butt.
As for 'fixing the economy', I also note the 'pubs claiming to be able to fix it better than the Obama administration are members of the same party as Bush 43 under who's watch the economy imploded and they are not mentioning that little sticking fact. Unfortunately for the Dems, many of us are old enough to remember Bill Clinton's success in economic matters and we are wondering how come Obama didn't do better at fixing things.
And then the damn 'pubs again, how many times they need their noses rubbed in alienating voters with their conservative moral and social policies ??
And the dam dems again, before Obama's first midterm election debacle in the house and senate, why the fuck didn't he get more shit done ???
(I could go on in rant mode back and forth for a couple hours here, but I'll spare you)

(haven't used the dancing badgers for a while, they'd do as well as either candidate . . . . )
IOW, regression/progression to the mean. It doesn't matter in regards to the dems or the pubs, we're going to have shit to bitch about, the progression of everything is going to continue to lurch repeatedly in random directions and it may not really matter much at all if it's a Trump or Hill admin, neither will have the control they think they do, and random shit will still occur to frustrate any thing good or bad they might be formulating.
Trump for wanting to fix something or the folks that either broke, didn't upgrade, or mismanaged that system ??
Operating a system so poorly that it needs to be shut down, fixed and rebooted (shades of the looming DC Metro fiasco!) isn't the fault of the one noting it's broken and wants to fix it, it's the folks that set it up/ broke it/ didn't maintain it/ didn't upgrade it that need a kick in the butt.
As for 'fixing the economy', I also note the 'pubs claiming to be able to fix it better than the Obama administration are members of the same party as Bush 43 under who's watch the economy imploded and they are not mentioning that little sticking fact. Unfortunately for the Dems, many of us are old enough to remember Bill Clinton's success in economic matters and we are wondering how come Obama didn't do better at fixing things.
And then the damn 'pubs again, how many times they need their noses rubbed in alienating voters with their conservative moral and social policies ??
And the dam dems again, before Obama's first midterm election debacle in the house and senate, why the fuck didn't he get more shit done ???
(I could go on in rant mode back and forth for a couple hours here, but I'll spare you)



(haven't used the dancing badgers for a while, they'd do as well as either candidate . . . . )
IOW, regression/progression to the mean. It doesn't matter in regards to the dems or the pubs, we're going to have shit to bitch about, the progression of everything is going to continue to lurch repeatedly in random directions and it may not really matter much at all if it's a Trump or Hill admin, neither will have the control they think they do, and random shit will still occur to frustrate any thing good or bad they might be formulating.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.