I always was suspicious of the Hadith. It sounded stupid to me. What you're trying to say is, and I agree, the people who use Hadith are saying the Quran is not clear enough so they need help because they cannot understand the Quran without them. And it's not just the Hadith, they need all kinds of other literature.
For Christians the Bible is enough...and if you want to know more you can go to university or Bible school to learn the history and influence. But for Shia, Sunni and Ibadi they have to use Hadith because they need a helping hand. Thousands and thousands of pages of Hadith. Are the Tasfir scholars not good enough?
So of course people cannot agree on the Quran. What you mean to say is: The Hadith have corrupted peoples' view of the Quran. There are so many Hadith collections and Hadith a lifetime would not be enough to examine them all in detail.
For Christians the Bible is enough...and if you want to know more you can go to university or Bible school to learn the history and influence. But for Shia, Sunni and Ibadi they have to use Hadith because they need a helping hand. Thousands and thousands of pages of Hadith. Are the Tasfir scholars not good enough?
So of course people cannot agree on the Quran. What you mean to say is: The Hadith have corrupted peoples' view of the Quran. There are so many Hadith collections and Hadith a lifetime would not be enough to examine them all in detail.