RE: There is no "I" in "You"
May 17, 2016 at 4:57 pm
(This post was last modified: May 17, 2016 at 5:00 pm by quip.)
(May 17, 2016 at 4:53 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Mhm, which unfortunately is why "We don't know, let's see if we can find out more in the future."
Again perhaps, though is even within the purview of science?
(May 17, 2016 at 4:56 pm)Rhythm Wrote:Thanks.(May 17, 2016 at 4:52 pm)quip Wrote: Perhaps, that's where science may fall short. QED
QED...lol? You intended to demonstrate that science can't answer a non-sensical question? Congratulations...I guess.
Though don't write science off too fast!