Can't prove the supernatural God

[SteveII]

You really can't understand the difference between examining if a series of events happened and the 27 sources that describe these events? Answer the question I asked: then by that standard we could never believe anything that happened in the past on any subject?

By corroborating evidence from various different sources, the more the better.

As far as I can see you haven't examined anything other than the Bible, and it makes no difference as to whether you split it up into 27 sources to make it sound more credible my friend, it's still the Bible.

I asked for your other reliable sources please.

So in one sentence you ask for "various different sources" and in the very next sentence you say "it makes no difference as to whether you split it up into 27 sources". You win. I can't argue with that logic.