RE: If You Don't Like It
May 26, 2016 at 4:33 pm
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2016 at 4:35 pm by WinterHold.)
Personally, the rule is very simple: as long as others don't inflict physical harm to you, either directly or indirectly, then it means THEY CARE ABOUT YOUR RIGHT, and it means THEY DO RESPECT YOU.
Those people didn't harm anybody.
I will stand against face veil for example because if poses a security threat (see my profile pic: I can do whatever I want with nobody recognizing my face :p ), I too will stand against racist banners since they would hurt the feelings of others.
I will stand against Muslims who want to force their vision on non-Muslims.
They don't want to shake hands mainly because they are "too conservative" and don't want to get horny by the touch of the opposing side's flesh; I, personally, think it's too much, but it's personal freedom !
If you force local traditions on others, then what is the difference between you, and the Arab bedwins who force their 9 years old daughters to marry 80 years old men again?because of what the local tradition dictates? what's the difference in terms of concept; really? focus on the "tradition enforcing"; not on the disgusting sexual intercourse.
?
That, to me, is a racist society that doesn't accept change, a bigoted authority that thinks it has the right to intervene in peoples' personal lives.
But again, isn't that the curse of nationalism?
Humans are so tribal, indeed.
Those people didn't harm anybody.
I will stand against face veil for example because if poses a security threat (see my profile pic: I can do whatever I want with nobody recognizing my face :p ), I too will stand against racist banners since they would hurt the feelings of others.
I will stand against Muslims who want to force their vision on non-Muslims.
They don't want to shake hands mainly because they are "too conservative" and don't want to get horny by the touch of the opposing side's flesh; I, personally, think it's too much, but it's personal freedom !
If you force local traditions on others, then what is the difference between you, and the Arab bedwins who force their 9 years old daughters to marry 80 years old men again?because of what the local tradition dictates? what's the difference in terms of concept; really? focus on the "tradition enforcing"; not on the disgusting sexual intercourse.
?
That, to me, is a racist society that doesn't accept change, a bigoted authority that thinks it has the right to intervene in peoples' personal lives.
But again, isn't that the curse of nationalism?
Humans are so tribal, indeed.
