(April 19, 2011 at 5:03 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Not to quibble, D-P but "Paul" (or whoever) was clearly commenting on the OT in Romans. Second-hand bigotry is still bigotry and the source is that vile pile of shit called "Leviticus."
Points well taken but clearly, from Romans, Christians have always kept the parts of the OT they like and claim "fulfillment" to toss aside the rest. They beat us over the head with the 10 Cs but then when I pointed out Christianity is in violation of commandment #4 (they moved the sabbath to Sunday), Christians I've addressed seem find dismissing it as part of the OT. Their comfort with their own inconsistency sometimes amazes me.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
