The Problem of Evil (XXVII)

[Angrboda]

It is foundational?  What's that even mean?  That it cannot be mistaken?  Like I said, it sounds like it's just made up.

If the study of God is not governed by logic and reason, then nothing can be known about Him. On the other hand, there is no reason to think that knowledge of God does not conform to logic and reason. Every revelation has been in language we can understand including actually stating the purpose of the revelation is our understanding and knowledge of God.

You're conflating obeying the laws of logic with being constrained by them. Even so, there's no reason to think our knowledge of God is reliable. Is that a presupposition?