Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 8, 2025, 3:56 pm

Poll: Monogamous or not
This poll is closed.
monogamous
76.92%
30 76.92%
not monogamous
15.38%
6 15.38%
some other description
7.69%
3 7.69%
Total 39 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Monogamous or not.
#63
RE: Monogamous or not.
(June 7, 2016 at 3:56 pm)robvalue Wrote: I can't remember if this has been mentioned already but...

There's one quite obvious advantage to being monogamous: peace of mind about STDs. You only need one check each, then you're set.

I'm not suggesting this would/should be a deciding factor, it's just a bonus really.

While it's a perk to get less STD's, Monogamy is certainly not a guarantee or peace of mind that you won't get STD's. For example...

1) Your partner could be having sex with others.
2) You could get an STD from public restrooms.
3) You can get STD's like Hep. A from contaminated food.
4) Skin to skin contact with certain STD's of other people.
5) You can get STD's from other bed-sheets.
6) Tanning beds can leave STD's from other people.
7) Used razors can also harbor STD's.

I'm not starting an argument, just being nit-picky.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:14 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 5, 2016 at 10:21 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:23 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Ravenshire - June 5, 2016 at 10:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:26 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 7:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:38 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:52 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:59 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 7:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:50 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Heatheness - June 5, 2016 at 10:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 5, 2016 at 10:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 5, 2016 at 10:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:01 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:02 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:06 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 6, 2016 at 11:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by madog - June 5, 2016 at 11:11 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 6, 2016 at 12:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 12:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 6, 2016 at 4:00 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 6:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 6, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 4:26 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 6:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 6:54 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 7:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 7:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:55 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 9, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:14 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:15 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:27 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 9:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:06 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 11:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:09 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by account_inactive - June 6, 2016 at 6:24 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 6, 2016 at 7:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:44 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 4:20 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Gemini - June 6, 2016 at 8:46 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Athene - June 6, 2016 at 9:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by KevinM1 - June 7, 2016 at 1:58 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 7, 2016 at 3:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 7, 2016 at 3:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 7, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 7, 2016 at 7:03 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 7, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by lisah - June 11, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Valkyrie - June 7, 2016 at 8:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 7, 2016 at 10:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 8, 2016 at 5:57 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 8, 2016 at 2:48 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 3:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 8, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 6:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 8, 2016 at 3:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by YahwehIsTheWay - June 9, 2016 at 10:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Cecelia - June 10, 2016 at 6:36 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 10, 2016 at 6:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:52 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Expired - June 27, 2016 at 7:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:59 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:31 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:34 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:53 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 9:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 6:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:28 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by mlmooney89 - June 27, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:17 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Grand Nudger - June 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 16, 2016 at 7:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrokenQuill92 - July 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 9:16 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by rexbeccarox - July 16, 2016 at 9:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 1:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 17, 2016 at 2:21 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 3:18 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 17, 2016 at 4:08 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 4:10 am



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)