Monogamous or not.

[paulpablo]

Being non monogamous by definition means you're in closer proximity to more vaginas than if you were monogamous.

So sarcasm involved or not, being monogamous is the lifestyle where you're in a very real sense repelling vaginas (except the one you're having sex with.)

If you're purposefully monogamous you're repelling, or at least avoiding contact in a very real physical and psychological way with all over vaginas except one.

If you're non monogamous finding like minded people really isn't that hard.  With the internet it's basically like shooting fish in a barrel, before the internet I remember nightclubs having a fairly high percentage of non monogamous people. 

Yeh if you walk around with a T shirt that says "PUSSAYYY PATROL!!" and you brag to every female you're trying to get with about how many other females you've been with your chances of success will be very highly diminished when trying to chat to girls in the local library.  But just in general it's not that difficult to be non monogamous and not repel women, in my experience.  I admit it is all subjective to circumstances.

Okay, you missed my point or you're being flippant here. Maybe for you it's not, but for me, it's not easy to just find like-minded people of minority ideologies on the whole, like atheists or whatever. So what would you know on the topic of non-monogamous guys looking for girls that like that? Are you a non-monogamist who finds it easy to find what you want? Or are you just an armchair specialist on the subject? My point, that went flying past your head, is that it's not just so easy to find girls who are not into monogamy. I thought that much would have been obvious based on what I said, or the fact that women in other species as well as our own tend to want providers for their offspring, so there's the evolutionary aspect here as well. So in conclusion, if a guy goes around saying they're non-monogamist, it's not going to be appealing to most women, thus the pussy repellent comment I made.

I find it easy to find women who are non monogamous. I said in my previous post this is a subjective experience.  Although if you have an internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women while trying very hard I'd say you must be really really bad at using the internet in general.

 Women in other species aren't called women, you're thinking of females. It depends upon the breeding strategy of the species as to whether or not they choose dependable fathers, there's something called r/K selection theory, some people apply this theory to different breeding patterns of humans.

Yes if a guy goes around saying they're non monogamist they will be repellent for women I imagine.  But it was very rare for me to talk about monogamy or non monogamy with any girl I had sex with when I was living a very non monogamous lifestyle.  Sex would occur before any deep conversation about ethics, morality or lifestyle choices were mentioned.

So yes the words "I'm non monogamous" are possibly more repellent to a woman than the words "I'm monogamous"  But being non monogamous means, purely by definition, that you are with more than one woman in a short period of time.  Being monogamous means that you're with one woman over a significant amount of time in a relationship.  And you're repelling, or at least not actively trying to attract any other women, unlike the person who is non monogamous who by definition has attracted at least two women at the same time.