RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
June 10, 2016 at 5:04 pm
(This post was last modified: June 10, 2016 at 5:17 pm by Heatheness.)
(June 10, 2016 at 1:05 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Greetings, heathenistical turds.
Here's a hypothetical question for yall:
If you were were having a baby boy tomorrow, would you opt for him to be circumcised?
Why or why not?
Thanks!
Nearly 27yrs ago my baby boy was born and I left his perfectly good penis in tact. I taught him to keep it clean. I did not whack off bits of it because of some ignorant religious fad about keeping boys from masturbating. I also told him that it wasn't wrong to please himself, just that he needed to do that in private. Thirty years ago 88% of male babies were mutilated, now only a little more than 50% are and it's dropping every year. That foreskin is a vital and viable part of their sexuality and pleasure sensors. It's cruel to remove it just because; fad.
I do not believe in unnecessary surgeries or body modifications for children. Leave that for them to decide for themselves when they are adults. I also would not tattoo a child, nor brand them, not pierce them, nor remove the labia of a girl. Hopefully, it will be illegal soon to mutilate little boys, just as it is for little girls.
You may call it circumcision but I call it what it is, genital mutilation. It's wrong, we need to stop it.
(June 10, 2016 at 1:06 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I voted yes.
Why?
Because it looks better that way.
Your turn.
It's not your penis and hopefully you won't be looking or using it when he's grown. It's morally and ethically wrong to remove a body part of a child for fashion. How vulgar and egotistical.
If your mother didn't like nipples would you consider it appropriate if she had them removed from you when you were a baby? There are people who think it's pointless for males to have nipples, will you have them cut off your male baby too?