To circumcise or not to circumcise?

[deleteduser12345]

Greetings, heathenistical turds. 

Here's a hypothetical question for yall:

If you were were having a baby boy tomorrow, would you opt for him to be circumcised? 

Why or why not? 

Thanks!

A big big big NO. The most obvious one which should be enough to leave him intact. It's his penis, you're not gonna live the rest of his life with his penis, it doesn't matter how it looks to you, it's his body, his decision. The so called health benefits are all a myth IIRC it was based on a shitty study made somewhere in Africa where they couldn't clean their foreskins. In all cases it reduces the sensitivity of the penis, in some cases some still have a decent amount, but still they lost sensitivity for no damn reason. In many cases the penis can go numb, or lose a lot of sensitivity, tmi maybe but unfortunately I am one of those cases and it's not fun at all. There is a reason why companies trying to surgically restore the whole foreskin using stemcells are so successful. There is a reason why manually restoring ones foreskin (without the frenulum etc) by inducing mitosis by tugging the skin regularly is becoming more and more popular. There are whole communities dedicated to it and every single person I've encountered who has done it have reported major increases in sensitivity. Although note that right now surgical restoration is a red flag. One important aspect is the gliding function that is important too. If a circumcision is handled incorrectly it can lead to awful skin bridges, skin tunnels and such. Keep in mind the majority of the europeans are uncut and they're completely fine. I live in Sweden where the majority are uncut, I don't see them walking around with stds, I don't see headlines about how their foreskin causes pain, I don't see a single negative aspect of it. Last but not least, it's very very easy to clean it. Fyi circumcised penises also produce smegma, it just rubs off against the underwear.

All that against "I think it looks good" which is also entirely subjective, and yet again, you won't be walking around with that penis, would you still get him circumcised despite knowing its harms? If he gets circumcised it should be purely his decision without anyone elses influence except if that person is unbiased and mentions all the cruel consequences that follow it. If one circumcises her child despite knowing all this, I'd doubt that persons intelligence, commonsense and would consider that person stubborn.