To circumcise or not to circumcise?

[deleteduser12345]

I havn't seen any men posting saying "I was cut against my will and it was abuse or "I hate my family for it". Both my x's were cut and they never had any issues staying hard or enjoying themselves. Most men who actually got the snip are thankful because its easier to keep clean and more aesthetically pleasing to woman. 

I'm just going by what the snipped say. If stats point to large populations who suffer with feelings of abuse and regret then ill switch my stand, but I dont think they do.

You've not experienced near the majority. There are many who lose shit loads of sensitivity from circumcision, including me, this thing is as numb as the back of my hand and I've spent lots of time searching around communities dedicated to manually and non surgically restoring their foreskin, they've all reported much greater sensitivty once the inner foreskin grows and the foreskin covers the glans, it results in the glans "dekeratinizing" (Don't know if that's the correct word). Many basically see the keratin from the gland peeling off or rubbing off gradually when the foreskin starts covering it and it results in increased sensitivity.
Let's make a situation here. Let's say 3-5% of all circumcised men lose their sensitivty, would you circumcise your child in that case? My answer would be no, because uncut is not worse in any way unless you live in a third world country where you can't clean your foreskin. Circumcision carries a risk, and even if it literally did not, there is no reason at all to circumcise, especially not an infant against its will. Uncut is better in pretty much every way speaking in terms of functions. The gliding function, the frenulum and ridgid band aren't to be cut away. Even aesthetically, that's purely subjective. Keep in mind, one can get used to uncut penises but a man with a cut penis can't get used to how numb, dry and annoying it can potentially be, especially without the gliding function.