RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
June 11, 2016 at 12:36 pm
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2016 at 12:39 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(June 11, 2016 at 12:02 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Put it this way. Any children I have, I've decided that they're going to have their eyelids sliced off. It's only pieces of skin and I think it looks nicer.
And I think I'd have mine shellless. Turtles look better without their shells. It's not like they need them or anything. It's an improvement on gawd's design. I want it removed like a true Christina.
Oh wait, I'm a non-Christina and shells are natural and kinda important for turtles.
Hmmm. But shells are a pain to wash.
It's so hard. I can't decide whether to rip the shells off my future offspring without their consent or not. Many turtles do it, there's even invalid fabricated evidence out there that suggests there are health benefits to being a shellless turtle. Genuine invalid fabricated evidence.
Anyways, many people do it and the whole thing is highly amusing to me and not even remotely grotesquely fucking immoral.
After all it's a moot point because I have a good turtle buddy who had his shell removed and he told me if we adopt kids he wants to rip their shell off as it was done to him when he was a tiny turtle. It's out of my hands.
Besides, a turtle without a shell? Come on it looks better!