(June 11, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Aegon Wrote:(June 11, 2016 at 4:04 pm)Losty Wrote: Why should you have a vendetta against parents who likely made a decision out of ignorance based on what they thought was best for you?
Show me some scientific evidence that shows a causation (not a correlation) of infections or disease?
Have you ever had an orgasm with your foreskin intact? Can you link the study?
Are you sure your argument is not made out of ignorance? I read a study yesterday where 38 women said that there was no difference in sexual stimulation and 9 said that there was increased sexual pleasure and 0 said that there was decreased pleasure after having their labia and clitoral hood cut. Knowing this, would you also advocate for female circumcision or at least say it's not a big deal?
It's barbaric because it is chopping off part of a baby's genitals for no good reason. How could that ever not be barbaric?
There are huge differences between male and female circumcision. FMG affects the girl's ability to become pregnant later on in life, it is way more commonly botched, and way more tissue and nerve endings are removed. The rate of botched male circumcisions are relatively much lower.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/co...130/3/e756
"Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks; furthermore, the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for families who choose it. Specific benefits from male circumcision were identified for the prevention of urinary tract infections, acquisition of HIV, transmission of some sexually transmitted infections, and penile cancer. Male circumcision does not appear to adversely affect penile sexual function/sensitivity or sexual satisfaction."
Female circumcision is not generally the horror stories you see in the news. It's just a trimming of the labia minora and the clitoral hood.
Why is it ok to mutilate a genitals if you're less likely to royally fuck it up?
