RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
June 11, 2016 at 11:44 pm
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2016 at 12:18 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(June 11, 2016 at 10:51 pm)paulpablo Wrote: They still do perform circumcision to treat some medical problems in modern hospitals.
They also perform amputations. When there's no other option. That's not in any way the same, as prophylactic removal of a body part - fairly important to the quality of the child's future sexual life - for no reason at all. Circumcision - just like creationism - is somewhat popular among non-Jews, non-Muslims in US and only there, so no wonder people are less apprehensive about it and some doctors are likely to suggest it.
I live in Europe, where most people consider circumcision a barbaric procedure, associated with religion and certain ethnic identities. Doctors here are in no way quick to recommend it, especially that it would probably not be taken well by most men.
(June 11, 2016 at 10:51 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I don't know the precise details but I know 2 people who've been circumcised during adulthood and I'm pretty sure one was std related and both were seemingly the recommended medical procedure given by doctors.
Again - I imagine there are certain circumstances, when foreskin removal is necessary. I don't believe those situations are common, however. I myself was diagnosed with phimosis as a kid - yet there was no need to cut anything and my penis works fine. There are usually other, non-surgical methods to deal with such problems. However if the doctor is convinced, that cut penis is a wonderful thing, because that's what his parents decided for him - he's likely to just break out the scalpel.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw