(June 14, 2016 at 10:14 am)abaris Wrote: It's not about a non gun debate, Drich. It's about a controlled gun ownership debate.
Noone can answer me why everyone should have access to an assault rifle, just to give one example. It's in the nature of these pieces to deal out more damage in a shorter period of time than any handgun. It's also about not every idiot having access to a deadly weapon. According to news coverage, this guy was already on the radar. Why someone like that could purchase his gun is beyond me.
Abaris, I will answer you. NO civilian should have access to an assault rifle. There is NO justified use case for such a weapon. Also, we are asking the same questions about how a man who has been on the radar was allowed to legally purchase weapons.
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
