(June 21, 2016 at 1:06 am)JBrentonK Wrote: The ontologicial arguement is based on truth based claims,
NO, it is not! Have you actually read it? Premise #1 is never proven which invalidates the entire argument. It is not proven or deduced within the argument nor anywhere else. The "ontologicial arguement" is completely invalid (and misspelled).
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
