(June 21, 2016 at 5:41 pm)Dust_bunny Wrote: And then we get into a whole new debate on allergy and what "allergy" actually means. I think your definition and the definition of allergy used here is old school. If you think that" allergy" refers to only IgE mediated allergies then we disagree on the terminology but I'm sure we would have to agree to disagree on it.
An excerpt...
I think it boils down to this
Treat the neurotransmitters with antidepressants
or
Pull the plugs on the cause ( the ovaries that produce the offending hormones )
My point is that woman should have that option, long before their lives have been destroyed. But Big pharma makes much more money off option one.
Maybe they will change their stand when they use their logic to realize they can really profit off osteoporosis.
When all is said and done, the truth can always been found in the most up to date hoarded patents. I will check them out later. I will look for better links on the allergy theory as well... probably wont find much for another 5-10 years.
In regards to your comnent about thyroid issues, yes agreed, but your original definition of the ovarian hypothesis was wrong as it inferred an imbalance so my comment was in regards to your position.
It's a womans problem because it happens to woman and even if it was due to testosterone, it would still be a womans problem...
Moderator Notice
If you post an excerpt, post it as a quote and give clear credit to whomever actually wrote it, otherwise it's plagairism. If you make a huge post, hide tags are your friend.
I'll wait for your allergy source. Not even contemplating your "belief". PMS anaphylaxis, source please. Or is this an anecdote?
Do you know the cost/profit associated with pre/post surgery related medications? They do profit from osteoporosis prevention medication. Look it up.
You can stay on Lupron for life. Look it up. Oh hell: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193774/
As for the eggs and 10 years of hormone production, so? Back to make a risk vs benefit analysis on selecting a treatment.
The "ovarian hypothesis" was not my definition. That was the source. So you went out of your way to comment on a model that is not current. Great.
Yes, it's a woman's problem. What's your point? Impotence after prostate surgery is a mans problem. Again, what's the point?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.