Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 1, 2025, 1:21 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
madog Offline
progeny of godpa and dogma
***
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation: 11
#142
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
June 22, 2016 at 4:58 pm (This post was last modified: June 22, 2016 at 5:00 pm by madog.)
(June 22, 2016 at 4:17 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote:  "That which most completely exists" what pretentious bunk, either something exists or it doesn't.  

Isn't something that "most completely exists" something completely in the natural world and something that partly exists something that is only partly in the natural world?

Seems CW's God isn't supernatural as it completely exists  Tongue
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by madog - June 22, 2016 at 4:58 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 102879 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Silver 26 8120 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)