(June 25, 2016 at 11:13 pm)Heatheness Wrote:(June 25, 2016 at 11:06 pm)paulpablo Wrote: There's two ways it could be corrected.
1) Either allow pictures of topless women of all ages to be posted anywhere in the forum potentially allowing people to break actual laws beyond forum rules and potentially allowing what would be classed as child pornography onto the forums.
2) Ban all pictures of any breasts. Practically speaking there would be no point to this whatsoever.
The rule of no nudity already exists. That is not in dispute. The rule does not discriminate.
BUT has it, is it and will it be upheld equally by the mods, is the question to be answered.
And I imagine it exists to the same extent that it exists in normal day to day law in general.
Going back to what I was saying which is that to make everything totally equal you could either allow women of all ages to post topless pictures which would potentially break the law, or ban anyone from posting topless pictures which would have no practical reasons.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
