Monogamous or not.

[MJ the Skeptical]

Okay, you missed my point or you're being flippant here. Maybe for you it's not, but for me, it's not easy to just find like-minded people of minority ideologies on the whole, like atheists or whatever. So what would you know on the topic of non-monogamous guys looking for girls that like that? Are you a non-monogamist who finds it easy to find what you want? Or are you just an armchair specialist on the subject? My point, that went flying past your head, is that it's not just so easy to find girls who are not into monogamy. I thought that much would have been obvious based on what I said, or the fact that women in other species as well as our own tend to want providers for their offspring, so there's the evolutionary aspect here as well. So in conclusion, if a guy goes around saying they're non-monogamist, it's not going to be appealing to most women, thus the pussy repellent comment I made.

I find it easy to find women who are non monogamous. I said in my previous post this is a subjective experience.  Although if you have an internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women while trying very hard I'd say you must be really really bad at using the internet in general.

 Women in other species aren't called women, you're thinking of females. It depends upon the breeding strategy of the species as to whether or not they choose dependable fathers, there's something called r/K selection theory, some people apply this theory to different breeding patterns of humans.

Yes if a guy goes around saying they're non monogamist they will be repellent for women I imagine.  But it was very rare for me to talk about monogamy or non monogamy with any girl I had sex with when I was living a very non monogamous lifestyle.  Sex would occur before any deep conversation about ethics, morality or lifestyle choices were mentioned.

So yes the words "I'm non monogamous" are possibly more repellent to a woman than the words "I'm monogamous"  But being non monogamous means, purely by definition, that you are with more than one woman in a short period of time.  Being monogamous means that you're with one woman over a significant amount of time in a relationship.  And you're repelling, or at least not actively trying to attract any other women, unlike the person who is non monogamous who by definition has attracted at least two women at the same time.

So fucking dumb and generalized...there are plenty of factors why it's hard to find a minority group which has nothing to do "not being able to use the internet" you condescending cunt.

Like; Location, Specific desires, Your gender, Your age, Your demeanor, Your choices etc.

Yeah, in your anecdotal subjective experience it was easy, good for you romeo, you don't get to generalize people who can't because it was "easy" for you, that's fucking stupid. You even admit if people go around saying they don't fall under the strict monogamous label it's not going to be easy to find like minded people, as is such the case on the internet. Especially if you are a guy, who has to try much harder than a woman does to find what he wants. And yet again you are just dead fucking wrong, just because you are non-monogamous does not mean you are always around tons of vaginas. You could just not be into relationships which would disqualify you from monogamy as well.