(June 29, 2016 at 9:00 pm)Losty Wrote:(June 29, 2016 at 6:47 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: I made a specific argument about the conflicting goals of the forum and the prevailing U.S. legal opinions pertaining to them. Others argued that the forum was following the law of the land in making the distinction that it does.
If you want, feel free to make the argument again. I think I must have not understood your point last time.
ETA- nope I got it the first time
I believe the counter argument was
"If girls can't post their nips then boys shouldn't be allowed too!"
Or something along those lines.
Someone said something about a sacrifice of solidarity is difficult if there's no benefit for the ones sacrificing. I insist that, in this case, there would be no benefit for anyone at all.
That is the point. No benefit drives change as much as realized benefit. For every slight no matter how small, is intent.
You have the right to your opinion as I do mine. I just choose to at least considered the serious povs. I did not mock nor condescend a different viewpoint, unlike some. But no matter this thread is as dead as the stunt that killed it. Congrats. Guess that makes you a winner.