(June 30, 2016 at 6:17 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Maybe you could get to the crux of her point, which is that leaning on the low bar of what the law defines as pornography is weaksauce. I've got nothing but love for all involved, but geez, if female nipples are verboten, shouldn't male nips be too? Law be damned, she's speaking to principle. Why is that so difficult?
Here, I'll go first -- I won't post male nips in this post.
See how easy that was?
I'm happy to help equality along.
You see but see how level headed you are?
I'm absolutely glad to agree to disagree with you here. I don't agree that this topic is important when it comes to equal rights for women on this forum. If you think it is, I respect your right to feel that way. And I respect your decision to not post your exposed chest. I will not post mine too.
But you're looking at this as if you know everything and you don't. You can think me childish if you want. I don't think you would like it if someone accused you of being involved in a conspiracy to close their thread, especially if said conspiracy involved posting child pornography.
I was perfectly happy in this thread being silly, maybe but not mean or rude (I don't think) until that accusation was made.
For the record, I would never ever use any method to try to get a thread closed accept for the appropriate method for when a thread violates rules. More importantly, I would never ever instigate or condone the posting of child pornography on this board or elsewhere ever. If I'm being overly sensitive for finding that accusation to be incredibly offensive then so be it. But I take it very seriously, as I well should considering the criminal nature of child pornography.