So regarding the OP topic, it all boils down to one of two administrative options that are both perfectly legal:
Option 1: keep things as they are now. Pros being that it's the more popular option, and doesn't demand any additional censoring on the part of members.
Option 2: ban/censor male nudity in every case where female nudity would've been banned. Pro being that it's the more egalitarian option.
Whatever the case, it's going to be a tricky case for the staff. I personally would've opted for 2, but that's not up to me.
Option 1: keep things as they are now. Pros being that it's the more popular option, and doesn't demand any additional censoring on the part of members.
Option 2: ban/censor male nudity in every case where female nudity would've been banned. Pro being that it's the more egalitarian option.
Whatever the case, it's going to be a tricky case for the staff. I personally would've opted for 2, but that's not up to me.
