(June 30, 2016 at 8:43 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(June 30, 2016 at 8:30 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: It doesn't have a damn thing to do with not posting male nipples. Not wishing to unnecessarily restrict posts informed that part of the decision.
The liability comes from some busybody suing or prosecuting because their little Johnny saw some boobs here.
Nonsense. I have several times specifically said that I respect the forum's desire and indeed requirement to stay inside the law, and nowhere in that post you quoted did I advocate for showing female breasts.
Her entire point is that if the Staff is committed to equality, ought they not put that into practice?
No one is asking you to show little Johnny some tits, so really, quit the goddamned strawman already.
(June 30, 2016 at 8:30 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: I personally am not interested in censoring posts of the sort that don't create that sort of liability.
In other words, you're happy doing the minimum possible to comply with the law. Great, I understand that. Don't feel like going further? Okay. You've said as much, and I'm pretty sure that was her point.
We also happen to be volunteers and this is not my hill to die on. The OP seemed to have an ax to grind from the start amd now I feel like I'm being criticized for not being activist enough on behalf of AF.
BTW, you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I suppose I explained it poorly. I *never* implied you were advocating for allowing female nipples - that was simply one of the remedies that were possible.
Due to some personal issues at the moment, I'm not able to give this the attention it deserves, so I'm going to stop here.
